How Does Language Define Who We Are Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

How Does Language Define Who We atomic number 18 - Essay ExampleFor instance, the English that one uses at home is poles apart from the language one would engross in ones workplace or educational institution. This is because when a person is around his family or friends, i.e. around batch who are intimate with him and have known him for a length of time, the mask that one wears to the outside orb slips away and an individual feels no need to hide behind a facade of statelyity. This natural and cursory transition that one makes from formal mode to casual mode, might appear strange when studied from a distance but if one were to observe closely, it would be seen that this is universal behavior where even the most formal of people will be seen using an entirely different type of English when in promiscuous surroundings. Another point worth noticing is how individuals for whom English is not their mother play, speak it.There is a common perception amongst people that those who speak accurate English, free from any grammatical errors, are gifted with with child(p) insight, depth of perception, logic and common sense and have comparatively superior education and wisdom than those who speak, as burn puts it, broken fractured or limited English. This case is discussed at great length by Tan who gives the example of her own mother. Tans mother reads the Forbes report, listens to W each(prenominal) Street Week, converses with her stockbroker and reads Shirley McLains novels (p.258). All these prove that she is a woman of above-average wisdom and her command over English language is better than most people, even better than those whose mother tongue is English. Unfortunately, Tans mothers speaking powers are slightly weak and she tends to speak English that is grammatically poor. As a result, she faces great difficulty in her day to day life as most people in frequent places such as banks, restaurants and hospitals ignore her or are rude to her. For them sh e portrays the image of a woman who is unable(p) to understand and pick up simple rules of a simple language. It is due to this that once, even her daughter, despite well-educated of her mothers reading habits and talents, thought of her as somehow lacking in wisdom. As Tan writes, I was penitent of her English. I believed that her English reflected the quality of what she had to say. That is, because she expressed them imperfectly, her thoughts were imperfect (p.259).It cannot be denied that basic judgments about people are made based on a lot of factors, not the least of which is the persons language. A person who uses well-crafted sentences, employs all manner of embellishments or better still, uses difficult words, is considered to be highly learned, sea captain and someone with hordes of intellect. Perri Klass, a paediatrician by profession, related just such an experience from her personal life in her witty essay Shes Your Basic LOL in NAD. She relates how she came to ado pt the medical jargon that her colleagues used in their daily communication charm discussing patients medical condition. Klass relates her initial sense of awe at hearing all those acronyms and how even the complicated LOL cancelled out to be nothing more than Little Old Lady (p.98) but sounded extremely professional nonetheless. Klass recounts how she happily used these words despite knowing that at times they were nothing but cut into